The Teaching of Ethnic Language and the Role of Education in the Context of Mon Ethnic Nationality in Burma
Initial Report of the First Phase of the Study on the Thai-Burma Border
(November 1999 - February 2000)
by Thein Lwin
Abstract: The study initially found that there are two contradictory education policies between the Burmese Government and the Mon Education Committee of the New Mon State Party. The government policy leads to Burmanisation at the expense of other indigenous nationalities (see Education in Burma 1945-1999)1 while Mon education policy raises a strong nationalism, which can lead to xenophobia. The study has investigated the curricula and primary school syllabuses for Mon schools. Interviews with an official of the Mon Education Committee, two teachers and some exiled Burmese who stayed in the Mon area were conducted. However, due to the present political tensions on the Thai-Burma border, the researcher has not been able to investigate classroom practice regarding the above-mentioned policies.
1. Background
The study was launched in October 1999 for the 1999-2000 academic year to answer the following research questions:
1.What is the situation concerning education in the Mon area and the teaching of Mon language in particular?
2.How do education and the teaching of ethnic language underpin a conflict resolution between the Burmese Government and the Mon ethnic nationality?
The study is funded by the Department for International Development (DFID), London - the award is administered by the British Council on behalf of the DFID. The research is conducted under the supervision of the University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK and Naresuan University, Thailand. The location of the research is in the ethnic Mon area near the Thai-Burma border.
2. First Phase of the Study
The researcher was based at Naresuan University in Thailand during the first phase of the study (November 1999 - February 2000). He travelled along the Thai-Burma border and met some Mon educators. He collected education policy documents, school syllabuses and conducted interviews. More specifically, the researcher interviewed an official of the Mon Education Committee for three days - two hours each day. Two teachers were also interviewed - one is a two-hour interview and the other one is half an hour long. The interviews were tape-recorded. The researcher met some Burmese exiles who used to stay in the Mon area and asked them about the situation of schools and children there.
2.1 Historical Evolution Regarding the Teaching of the Mon Language
Lower Burma was once a Mon Kingdom under the name of Hong Sawatoi also known as Ramannadesa. Ramannadesa was ethnically, culturally and linguistically well developed since the 9th century. Mon literature was established in Buddhist monasteries since the ruling era of Mon kings. Although sovereign independence of the Mon was lost to the Burmese kings, the Mon monasteries served as the only centre of Mon language and literature teaching. Under the British colony (1885-1948), the education system changed from a Buddhist monastery education to various vernacular schools. The Mon language was allowed to be taught in schools in the Mon areas under the British administration. After the independence, the democratically elected government appointed skilful teachers to teach Mon literature in the Mon territory. However, the military government, which got power in 1962 ordered the teachers of Mon literature to step down from their position. Many teachers had to resign. As a consequence, the Mon language was no longer taught in 1965-1966. But villagers who treasured Mon language and literature hired at their own expense Mon teachers to teach their children. It would be difficult for the Mon language and literature to survive without official recognition by the government.
The New Mon State Party (NMSP), amongst other ethnic groups, has joined the armed insurgency since the independence of Burma in 1948. The NMSP formed an Education Department in 1972 and opened Mon National Schools in areas under their control - Tha-Ton, Moulmein and Tavoy. There are two committees in the Education Department: the Mon National Education Committee (MNEC) and the Textbook Committee. MNEC opened primary and secondary level Mon National Schools. There are 150 Mon National Schools. The medium of instruction in Primary Schools is the Mon language. In Junior Secondary Schools (Middle Schools), Mon History is taught in the Mon language and the other subjects are in Burmese. In the Senior Secondary Schools (High Schools), the medium of instruction is Burmese. Burmese is taught as a subject in all schools. In the Mon area (the three districts of Tha-Ton, Moulmein and Tavoy), there are altogether 340 schools (see the following table). Some 190 schools are under the control of the Burmese Government. MNEC organises evening and weekend classes at monasteries to teach the Mon language to pupils attending government-controlled schools.
Number of Schools, Students and Teachers (1999-2000)
District |
Township |
School |
Students |
Teachers |
|
|
Primary School |
|
|
Tavoy, |
Taik Bu |
21 |
2580 |
36 |
|
Ye (South) |
21 |
3757 |
66 |
|
Ye (North) |
47 |
5662 |
125 |
|
Bee Ree |
10 |
961 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Moulmein |
Tanbyuzayat |
45 |
3568 |
95 |
|
Mudon |
29 |
2119 |
69 |
|
Hlarda Kot |
40 |
8038 |
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tha-Ton |
Moulmein |
25 |
5003 |
46 |
|
Kaw Ka Rate |
43 |
4094 |
69 |
|
Kyaik Ma Raw |
46 |
7003 |
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle School |
|
|
Tavoy, |
Taik Bu |
1 |
150 |
6 |
|
Ye (South) |
2 |
214 |
11 |
|
Ye (North) |
3 |
408 |
19 |
|
Bee Ree |
1 |
25 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tha-Ton |
Moulmein |
2 |
910 |
14 |
|
Kaw Ka Rate |
4 |
1120 |
12 |
|
Kyaik Ma Raw |
2 |
404 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High School |
|
|
Moulmein |
Hlarda Kot |
1 |
156 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of school |
Students |
Teachers |
|
Primary School |
327 |
42815 |
748 |
|
Middle School |
15 |
3231 |
71 |
|
High School |
1 |
156 |
7 |
|
Total |
343 |
46202 |
826 |
|
[Source: Mon National Education Committee]
However, teachers of the Mon language and literature run the risk to be punished by the government authorities. Some teachers have been arrested. In 1994, some 30 schools were ordered to close because of the teaching of the Mon language. Again in 1998, 120 Mon schools attended by six thousand students were ordered to close by the government. Negotiations between the New Mon State Party and the Burmese Government meant that these schools could reopen, but the teaching of the Mon language and literature was not officially allowed.
2.2 Curriculum and Syllabuses
Mon, Burmese, English and Maths are taught in the Junior Primary level (Year 0, Year 1 and Year 2). Mon, Burmese, English, Maths, Geography and Mon History are taught in the Senior Primary level (Year 3 and 4). Mon, Burmese, English, Maths, Geography, Mon History and Science are taught in the Junior Secondary level (Year 5, 6, 7 and 8). Mon History is taught in the Mon language while the other subjects are in Burmese. As in government schools, Burmese, English, Maths, Science (Physics, Chemistry and Biology) and Social Studies (History, Geography and Economics) are taught in the Senior Secondary level (Year 9 and 10). These subjects are taught in Burmese. Schools also use textbooks prescribed by the Burmese Government. Mon language is not taught in the Senior Secondary level. At the end of this level, students enter the government national examination.
All Primary Schools subjects and Mon History textbooks for the Junior Secondary level are written in Mon language as prescribed by the Textbook Committee of the Mon Education Department. The study found, regarding especially in Mon History, that the children were taught about the Mon-Khamar route entering Burma, the kingdoms of Hong Sawatoi, Pegu, Thu-Wun-Na-Boun-Mi Tha-Ton, etc. However, the textbooks omit the history of the Burmans and the Burmese kingdoms. In particular, in the Year 3 Geography textbook, it is written that "the Burmans came to Burma lately. Therefore they could only stay in the central part of Burma rather than the coastal areas". The history of Burmans may be interpreted here as downgraded.
According to a teacher, children were happy in the classroom because they could learn in their mother tongue - but they are weak in Burmese.
2.3 Teachers' Situation
There are about 820 teachers in the Mon area. Teachers are recruited by the NMSP on a voluntary basis. NMSP provides teachers 50 buckets of rice in the husk a year, soap, toothpaste, candles, etc. They have no initial teacher training. The NMSP has organised in-service teacher training at its Head Quarters since 1992. From 1992 to 1994, there was a six-week training once a year. In 1995, there was no training because of the repatriation after the cease-fire agreement with the military regime. From 1996 to 1999, there was also a six-week training four times a year. According to the data provided by the Mon Education Committee, about 700 teachers were trained.
2.4 Funding for Mon Schools
The Mon Education Committee is financially supported for their schools by international NGOs such as Norway-Burma Council, Swiss Aid, Burma Border Consortium, Open Society Institute (Soros Foundation), etc. The local community also supports for school buildings and housing for teachers.
3. Further Research
The study will continue school observations, interviews with teachers and pupils in the second phase of the study (May-June 2000) to understand more about schools' situations and classroom practices as well as the situations of teachers and pupils. The study hopes that the second research question "How do education and the teaching of ethnic language underpin a conflict resolution between the Burmese Government and Mon ethnic nationality?" will be answered at the end of the second phase of the study. The final report will be submitted at the end of the study in October 2000.
Note: 1. Education in Burma (1945-1999) written by the researcher is available on the web site: http://www.students.ncl.ac.uk/thein.lwin/
3rd March 2000